University College Dublin

The Relationship between Aristotle’s Eudemian

and Nicomachean Ethics

 

Programme 

15 June

9:00-9:30 Coffee/Tea

9:30-10:45 – Carlo Natali (Venice) – The Proems to the EE and the EN

Chair: Tim Crowley (Dublin)

10:45-12:00 – Karen Margrethe Nielsen (Oxford) – Prohairesis in the EE and the EN

Chair: Luciana Soares Santoprete (CNRS/Dublin)                                  

12:00-12:15 Coffee/Tea

12:15-13:30 – Giulio Di Basilio (Dublin) – Habituation in the EE and the EN

Chair: Rowland Stout (Dublin)

13:30-15:00 Lunch

15:00-16:15 – Giulia Bonasio (New York City) – Perfect Agency in the EE and the EN

Chair: Bjorn Wastvedt (Arizona)

16:15-16:30 Coffee/Tea

16:30-17:45 – Terence Irwin (Oxford) – Voluntariness in the EE and the EN

Chair: Vasilis Politis (Dublin)

17:45-18:30 Round Table/Discussion

19:00 Conference Dinner

16 June

9:00-9:30 Coffee/Tea

9:30-10:45 – Marco Zingano (São Paulo) – The Definition of Virtue in the EE and the EN

Chair: Helen Dixon (Dublin)

10:45-12:00 – Friedemann Buddensiek (Frankfurt) – The Ergon Arguments in the EE and the EN

Chair: Peter Larsen (Dublin)

12:00-13:00 Lunch

13:00-14:15 – Christopher Rowe (Durham) – The EE and the EN: A Study in the Development of Aristotle’s Thought (1971) Revisited

                            Chair: John Dillon (Dublin)

14:15-15:30 – Round Table/Closing Remarks

Contact:

Dublin, NUI Headquarters (49 Merrion Square)

maria.baghramian@ucd.ie

(Text by the organizers)

Link

http://www.ucd.ie/philosophy/

Early Christian Determinism

A Study of The Ethics of The Tripartite Tractate

Paul Linjamaa, Leiden: Brill, 2018

Description

The aim of this study is to explore the ethics of the Nag Hammadi text, The Tripartite Tractate. This text, the fifth tractate in Nag Hammadi Codex I, has received comparatively little attention, although it is the most detailed Valentinian treaty still extant. By investigating the ethics of The Tripartite Tractate, this study not only illuminates a previously unstudied aspect of this very interesting early Christian text, but also seeks to explore the workings of early Christian determinism. This has previously been presented as “Gnostic”, and then not taken seriously, or been disregarded as an invention of intra-Christian polemics. The present study challenges this conception and presents insights into how early Christian determinism worked, sustaining viable and functioning ethical systems. The ethics of The Tripartite Tractate are approached by connecting practical, lived ethics and the theoretical foundations for ancient ethical discussion. This entails examining the text’s ontology and epistemology, as well as ancient cognitive and behavioral theory. In short, this study aims to answer the question, “how should people behave?”, by first exploring questions regarding how human behavior and actions were thought to have worked in the first place. Part I of the study investigates The Tripartite Tractate’s views on epistemology, ontology and theory of passions, as well as the nature of the human will and cognitive apparatus. It is noted that The Tripartite Tractate outlines a Christian deterministic system that denies free will in humans. The Tripartite Tractate presents an anthropology with three different classes of humans, each person being defined by the composition of their physical and mental make up, a mixture of the three basic substance viable in the cosmic system: matter, psychê and pneuma. This part of the study explores the The Tripartite Tractate’s dependence on, and relation to, Greco-Roman physics and theories of passions and cognition, and how they relate to and legitimize social structures. As a conclusion to Part I, the context of the text’s determinism is discussed and it is suggested that the views that Origen of Alexandria took action against in his work Peri Archon are reflected in The Tripartite Tractate. Part II of the study is devoted to the practical and social implications of the text’s determinism and explores how it would have worked to create and sustain group identity. It is argued that the tripartite anthropology promotes a pedagogical schema that points out different roles and responsibilities humans have in relation to each other. The people termed “pneumatics” are described as ethical experts and are called upon to play the role of teachers in the ideal community, while the people termed “psychics” are described as the helpers and students of the “pneumatics”. The “material” people are outsiders destined to be lost. It is argued that the text utilizes ancient pedagogic language in order to construct the ideal social structure, and the usage of the terms “church” and “school” in the text is analyzed. It is suggested that the most likely social structure referenced by TriTrac would have comprised a group consisting of two parts: intellectually advanced pneumatics in an inner study circle within a second, larger part consisting of psychic everyday Christians, two groups that at times came together to study and celebrate communion and baptism. The everyday Christians are described as driven by honor, and encouraged to prosper in the world for the benefit of the larger community. This is discussed in light of the concept of “honor” and its importance in Roman society. Part II of the study demonstrates the effectiveness of a deterministic anthropology for creating and sustaining a group structure where a viable ethical system was implemented. Part III of the study recapitulates the main arguments, and also explores the context of the text in light of the findings. It is argued that early third-century Alexandria is the most likely original context of the text. The implications of the study are discussed in light of the broader topic of early Christianity. Among other things, it is suggested that the doctrine of free will, which became a cornerstone in later Christianity, developed in the wake of debates with Christians we find represented in The Tripartite Tractate, whose approaches represent a serious alternative to the doctrine of free will.

(Text from the publisher)

Table of contents

Acknowledgments 
List of Abbreviations 
Introduction 
1 The Structure of the Present Study
2 Who Were the Valentinians?
3 The Myth in TriTrac and the Ethics in Storytelling
4 Previous Research on TriTrac and the Historical Setting of the Text
5 Early Christian Ethics and the Bad Reputation of Determinism
6 Notes on Translation and Transcription

Part 1: Theoretical Framework for Ethics

1 The Ontological and Epistemological Foundations for Ethics
1 Knowledge in TriTrac and Ancient Epistemology
2 Phantasms, Likenesses, and Images: the Ontology of TriTrac and the Question of Logos
3 Remembering (and) the Nature of Virtue
4 The Individual and the Collective
5 Mixing and Blending, Truth and Falsehood
6 Conclusion: Ontology, Epistemology and Ethics

2 Emotions, Demons, and Moral Ability
1 Emotions and Cognitive Theory in Ancient Thought
2 Emotions and the Creation Narrative
3 The Logos’ First Movement and Ancient Cognitive Theory
4 Good Emotions
5 Negative Passions as “Mixed” Heavenly Powers and their Influence on Humans
6 Apatheia, Therapeia, and Eleutheria
7 Femaleness and the Sickness of Emotions
8 Conclusion

3 Free Will and the Configuration of the Human Mind
1 Will and Ethics in Ancient Thought
2 Christian Free Will, the Configuration of God, and the Creation of the Cosmos
3 Free Will and Moral Accountability in TriTrac
4 TriTrac’s Anthropology in Context: Origen’s Christian Opponents

Part 2: Ethics in Practice

4 Natural Human Categories and Moral Progress
1 The Three Classes of Humans in TriTrac
2 The Pedagogical Purpose of the Logos’ Organization and the Composition of Humans
3 Three Categories of Humans According to TriTrac’s Epistemology and Theory of Passions
4 Restricted Choice in Practice
5 Fixed, Fluid, or in Flux? The Advantages of a Fixed Anthropology
6 Conclusions

5 School or Church? Teaching, Learning, and the Community Structure
1 On the Community Structure Behind TriTrac in Light of the Term “Church”
2 The Cosmos as a “School” in TriTrac and its Early Christian Context
3 The “School of Conduct” in the Pleroma and the Gaining of Form
4 The Cosmic School: an Imperfect Reflection of the Heavens
5 Silent and Oral Instruction: Formation, Baptism and Education
6 The Duty of the Pneumatic Moral Expert and the Formation of Psychic Christians
7 The Category of the ‘School of Valentinus’ in Early Christian Scholarship
8 Conclusions: the Dual Structure of the Community Behind TriTrac

6 Honor and Attitudes Toward Social and Political Involvement
1 TriTrac and Early Christian Attitudes Toward Involvement in Society
2 Cosmogony as Political Commentary
3 The Pursuit of Honor
4 Psychic Humans and their Political Involvement
5 Conclusion: the Character of Psychic Christians and Attitudes Toward Social and Ecclesiastical Involvement

Part 3: Conclusions and Implications

7 Summary: the Nature of Early Christian Determinism
1 TriTrac’s Alexandrian Context

Appendix: Implications and Suggestions for Further Studies
Bibliography
Ancient Authors and Texts
Secondary Literature
Index

Link

https://brill.com/view/title/55641

Processo a Socrate

Mauro Bonazzi, Bari: Laterza, 2018

Descrizione

399 a.C.: la città di Atene condanna a morte uno dei suoi figli più autorevoli, Socrate. Cosa è successo davvero nei mesi in cui si è svolta la vicenda giudiziaria? Si ripete spesso che si trattò di un processo politico mascherato, per colpire le simpatie oligarchiche dell’anziano filosofo. Ma forse il vero oggetto del contendere in questa vicenda fu proprio il pensiero di Socrate. Fino a che punto una comunità – ieri come oggi – può tollerare che i principi e i valori su cui si fonda siano messi radicalmente in discussione? E davvero le ragioni della filosofia e quelle della città non sono compatibili? Una lettura originale di uno dei più celebri processi della storia.

(Testo della casa editrice)

Indice

  1. In tribunale

Un processo celebre, e un altro processo celebre – La «questione socratica» – Il sistema dei tribunali

Intermezzo 1: Atene, una democrazia turbolenta

  1. L’oligarca

L’elefante – Anni difficili – Gli oligarchi intelligenti – Altri processi – Tutti pazzi per Sparta – Un processo senza (troppa) politica?

Intermezzo 2: Che cosa ha detto veramente Socrate: Platone e Senofonte a confronto

  1. L’empio

Introduzione – L’accusa di empietà – Filosofi e teologi – Il teologo empio

  1. Il cattivo maestro

Introduzione – Il discorso sul metodo – Cani, lupi, torpedini: un bestiario filosofico – Socrate e Alcibiade – Il maestro ignorante

Intermezzo 3: Topografia socratica

  1. La difesa e la morte di un uomo giusto

Voleva morire: su quello che Socrate avrebbe detto al processo – Il carcere – La cicuta – Il gallo

Ringraziamenti

Bibliografia

Link

https://www.laterza.it/scheda-libro/?isbn=9788858128138

 

Voici le rapport sur les fiches insérées de l’ouvrage de É. Bréhier, Plotin, Ennéades, t. II, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1964 (1924).

 

Numéros de fiches par Ennéade : Ennéade II : 9
Numéros de fiches par Traité : Traité 12 (II, 4) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 14 (II, 2) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 17 (II, 6) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 25 (II, 5) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 33 (II, 9) : 6
Traité 35 (II, 8) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 37 (II, 7) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 40 (II, 1) : 2
Traité 52 (II, 3) : 1

 

Consultez le contenu détaillé des fiches en faisant une recherche par Auteur moderne –  Bréhier, É.  – dans http://philognose.org/?page_id=300

Nous tenons à signaler que nous avons fait des fiches sur les commentaires de l’auteur moderne, dans ce cas É. Bréhier, et non pas sur les remarques de Plotin lui-même.

 

 

Voici le rapport sur les fiches insérées de l’ouvrage de É. Bréhier, Plotin, Ennéades, t. I, Paris, Les Belles Lettres, 1989 (1924).

 

Numéros de fiches par Ennéade : Ennéade I : 8 (l’une des fiches est liée au traité 45, Ennéade III).
Numéros de fiches par Traité : La Vie de Plotin : 3
Traité 1 (I, 6) : 1
Traité 16 (I, 9) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 19 (I, 2) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 20 (I, 3) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 36 (I, 5) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 46 (I, 4) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 51 (I, 8) : 2
Traité 53 (I, 1) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 54 (I, 7) : 1

 

Consultez le contenu détaillé des fiches en faisant une recherche par Auteur moderne –  Bréhier, É.  – dans http://philognose.org/?page_id=300

Nous tenons à signaler que nous avons fait des fiches sur les commentaires de l’auteur moderne, dans ce cas É. Bréhier, et non pas sur les remarques de Plotin lui-même.

Consortium cahier

ANF Concevoir et exploiter les sources numériques de recherche en SHS

Description et organisation

  • Vous êtes enseignant-chercheur, chercheur, doctorant, ingénieur et technicien, bibliothécaire,
  • Vous êtes ou allez être impliqué dans un projet de numérisation des sources de la recherche,

L’action nationale de formation « Concevoir et exploiter les sources numériques de la recherche en SHS » est faite pour vous. Cette deuxième édition est organisée du 24 au 28 septembre 2018 au Centre Paul-Langevin d’Aussois (73).

Elle vise à vous présenter les nouveaux contextes et cadres de travail de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales et à vous sensibiliser aux différents enjeux du monde des données numériques. La recherche en SHS prend désormais en compte l’arrivée massive de sources numérisées ou nativement numériques.

Cette ANF vous donnera une formation concrète et pratique introduisant à tous les aspects de la gestion de projets de sources numériques de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales. Pour vous aider dans l’organisation des projets numériques souvent multidisciplinaires, elle vous permettra de vous situer dans le paysage numérique et de s’orienter, en fonction de vos objectifs. Afin de vous permettre de mieux comprendre toutes les questions relatives à la gestion d’un projet, vous serez mis en situation en s’appuyant sur un cas pratique.

Cette ANF est proposéepar la MSH Val de Loire, par la formation continue du CNRS et par des acteurs des « Humanités numériques »

Pour plus d’informations sur la formation : http://anf.msh-vdl.fr

Inscriptions en ligne sur le site de l’ANF jusqu’au 31 mai 2018 : http://anf.msh-vdl.fr

Contact

Pour toute question veuillez vous s’adresser à Laurence Rageot.

(Texte des organisateurs)

Lien

https://cesr.cnrs.fr/actualites/actualites-scientifiques/anf-concevoir-et-exploiter-les-sources-num%C3%A9riques-de-la#:~:text=La%20recherche%20en%20SHS%20prend,en%20sciences%20humaines%20et%20sociales.

 

Voici le rapport sur les fiches insérées de l’ouvrage de R. Dufour,  J. Laurent et L. Lavaud, Plotin, Traités 22-26, présentés, traduits et annotés, sous la direction de L. Brisson et J. F. Pradeau, Paris, GF Flammarion, 2004.

 

Total de fiches par Ennéades :
7
Numéros de fiches par Ennéade : Ennéade II : 1
Ennéade III : 1
Ennéade V : Aucune référence trouvée.
Ennéade VI : 5
Numéros de fiches par Traité : Traité 22 (VI, 4) : 4
Traité 23 (VI, 5) : 1
Traité 24 (V, 6) : Aucune référence trouvée.
Traité 25 (II, 5) : 1
Traité 26 (III, 6) : 1

 

Consultez le contenu détaillé des fiches en faisant une recherche par Auteur moderne – Dufour, R., Laurent, J. et Lavaud, L. – dans http://philognose.org/?page_id=300

Nous tenons à signaler que nous avons fait des fiches sur les commentaires de l’auteur moderne, dans ce cas R. Dufour, J. Laurent et L. Lavaud, et non pas sur les remarques de Plotin lui-même.

Panthéon Sorbonne

Les Éléments de théologie de Proclus 

interprétations, réceptions de l’Antiquité à nos jours

Description et organisation

Ce colloque marque l’aboutissement d’une nouvelle traduction menée, pendant plusieurs années, par un groupe de chercheurs français et étrangers, des Éléments de théologie de Proclus. Cette œuvre fondamentale a à la fois constitué la métaphysique néoplatonicienne en système, et opéré comme le principal relais de la transmission du platonisme au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance. Par l’intermédiaire du Pseudo-Denys et du Liber de causis, elle a aussi eu une influence déterminante sur la philosophie byzantine et arabe. On peut encore en suivre la postérité dans la pensée anglaise, la métaphysique classique, et l’idéalisme allemand. Ce sont ces effets de transmission et d’hé­ ritage que nous nous proposons d’évaluer, à partir de trois questions centrales : « Systématicité », « Causalité », « Théologie ». Nous en interrogerons tant la formulation dans le texte même des Eléments que les reprises et réinterprétations, en cherchant à voir comment, à chacune de ces questions, correspondent des séquences distinctes de réception.

Programme

Jeudi 24 Mai

9h30 Présentation

Présidence : Luc BRISSON (Centre Jean Pépin, CNRS-ENS/LabEx HaStec)

10h Carlos STEEL (KU Leuven) La tradition manuscrite des Éléments de Théologie et l’apport des traductions anciennes

11h Joshua ROBINSON (Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies) Michael Psellos’ use of the Elements of Theology in the Interpretation of Christian Theology

Présidence : Gwenaëlle AUBRY (Centre Jean Pépin, CNRS-ENS/LabEx HaStec)

14h30 Lela ALEXIDSE (Univ. de Tbilissi) La hiérarchie ontologique dans le commentaire de Ioane Petritsi sur les Éléments de Théologie de Proclus

15h30 Alain LERNOULD (CNRS-STL) Sur la forme dite more geometrico des Éléments de Théologie de Proclus

17h Jan OPSOMER (KU Leuven) Structures argumentatives dans les Éléments de Théologie

Vendredi 25 mai 2018

Présidence : Jean-Baptiste BRENET (Université Paris- I)

9h Pieter d’HOINE (KU Leuven) Totalité et individu dans la proposition 67 des Éléments de Théologie

10h Cristina d’ANCONA (Univ. de Pise) Intellectualiter, vitaliter, enter : Proclus à Bagdad et à Paris

11h30 Julie CASTEIGT (Univ. Toulouse-II/LEM) La réception de la proposition 103 des Éléments de Théologie dans l’œuvre d’Albert le Grand

Présidence : Pierre-Marie MOREL (Université Paris- I)

14h30 Philippe HOFFMANN (EPHE-PSL, CNRS-LEM/LabEx HaStec) Le temps et l’éternité dans les Éléments de Théologie

15h30 Philippe SOULIER (CAPHI, Nantes) Structures argumentatives dans les Éléments de Théologie

17h Frédéric de BUZON (Univ. de Strasbourg) Les deux Proclus de Leibniz

Samedi 26 mai 2018

Présidence : Pierre CAYE (Centre Jean Pépin, CNRS-ENS)

9h Saverio ANSALDI (Univ. de Reims) L’écriture d’une nouvelle métaphysique : Giordano Bruno lecteur des Éléments de Théologie

10h Douglas HEDLEY (Univ. de Cambridge) Traces of the Elementatio theologica from Cudworth to Coleridge

11h Emmanuel CATTIN (Sorbonne Univ.) Théologie. Hegel et Proclus

Contact

Philo-Recherche@univ-paris1.fr

(Texte des organisateurs)

Lien

https://www.pantheonsorbonne.fr/evenements/elements-theologie-proclus-interpretations-receptions-lantiquite-nos-jours#:~:text=Colloque-,Les%20%C3%89l%C3%A9ments%20de%20th%C3%A9ologie%20de%20Proclus%20%3A%20interpr%C3%A9tations%2C%20r%C3%A9ceptions%20de%20l,%C3%89l%C3%A9ments%20de%20th%C3%A9ologie%20de%20Proclus.

Plotinus on Consciousness

D.M. Hutchinson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018

Description

Plotinus is the first Greek philosopher to hold a systematic theory of consciousness. The key feature of his theory is that it involves multiple layers of experience: different layers of consciousness occur in different levels of self. This layering of higher modes of consciousness on lower ones provides human beings with a rich experiential world, and enables human beings to draw on their own experience to investigate their true self and the nature of reality. This involves a robust notion of subjectivity. However, it is a notion of subjectivity that is unique to Plotinus, and remarkably different from the Post-Cartesian tradition. Behind the plurality of terms Plotinus uses to express consciousness, and behind the plurality of entities to which Plotinus attributes consciousness (such as the divine souls and the hypostases), lies a theory of human consciousness. It is a Platonist theory shaped by engagement with rival schools of ancient thought. Argues that the concept of consciousness existed in the ancient world and can be disentangled from Descartes and the Post-Cartesian tradition; Proposes a new interpretation of Plotinus’ philosophy of mind; Examines Plotinus’ theory of consciousness in dialogue with Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics

(Text from the publisher)

Table of contents

Acknowledgments

Notes on the Text

Introduction

Chapter 1 – Self

Chapter 2 – Conciousness Terms

Chapter 3 – First Layer :  the soul-trace

Chapter 4 – Second Layer :  the lower soul

Chapter 5 – Third Layer : the higher soul

Chapter 6 – Self-Determination

Chapter 7 – Conclusion

Appendix

Bibliography

General Index

Index Locorum

Link

http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/classical-studies/ancient-philosophy/plotinus-consciousness?format=HB&isbn=9781108424769#hwQ3e40BZqIeQOXw.97

University of London

The Sanctuary Project

Description and organization

A programme of research funded by the award of an Anneliese Maier Prize to Professor Greg Woolf by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation on the nomination of Professor Dr. Jörg Rüpke of the Max Weber Center of the University of Erfurt.

This research programme asks how sanctuaries formed human experience and religious knowledge in the ancient world. Specifically we aim is to establish conversations between a range of different disciplines including prehistoric and classical archaeology, social anthropology and ancient history, art history, Jewish and early Christian studies, and the history of religions.We also aim to encourage young researchers to engage in cross-disciplinary collaborations and to familiarize themselves with other intellectual traditions. We therefore seek a double outcome: A better, more rounded, set of understandings of the religious function of sanctuaries, especially in the classical world; a cadre of young researchers more able to pursue and generate cross disciplinary investigations of this kind.

Sanctuaries are common – perhaps universal – products of human societies. First attested in the Upper Paleolithic, the first sanctuaries appear at roughly the same time as evidence for ritual, art and music. As sites of material accumulation and symbolic investment they feature prominently in the archaeological record. And because they contain much of the early evidence for the cognitive activities of anatomically modern humans they have also been central to recent debates on the archaeology of mind.

Sanctuaries also have an important place in the history of religions, even if only a few studies, such as Jonathan Z. Smith’s To take place, have set them in the centre of the enquiry. By sanctuary is understood not just any site of ritual activity which in most societies was very widespread, taking place in domestic and funerary contexts, in connection with feasting and social rites of passage and so on.  Sanctuaries are rather places that are permanently special, even when no rituals are taking place. Some historically and ethnographically attested societies treat sanctuaries as places where divine beings are particularly accessible, where individual humans might encounter them in dreams, prophesies or theophanies, locations of communal ceremonial, and even as places in some sense inhabited by gods and marked by divine action. The sanctuaries of the ancient world have received a good deal of attention from archaeologists and historians of religion. Many of these studies are focused on architectural elaborations. Some deal with sanctuaries as locations for ceremonies, stages for Festkultur and meeting places for communities. More recently studies have explored how communities come into being and reproduce themselves through the construction, elaboration and use of common sanctuaries; the connection of sanctuary building with state formation and inter-state diplomacy; and the archaeological traces of specific ritual actions.

The Sanctuary Project will build on studies of this kind but has a different focus, one that in which religious action is centred. We aim to explore the part sanctuaries played in creating the religious experience of ancient worshippers. In effect we shall ask How sanctuaries worked in ancient religious systems?

(Text by the organizers)

Link

https://sanctuaryproject.blogs.sas.ac.uk/