Plato Latinus

Aspects de la transmission de Platon en Latin dans l’Antiquité

Jean-Baptiste Guillaumin et Carlos Lévy (éd.), Turnhout: Brepolis, 2018

Description

Recueil d’études sur la présence du platonisme dans la littérature latine antique.
Si Platon constitue, pour les auteurs latins, une autorité et une figure de référence, la philosophie “platonicienne” a connu, de l’époque tardo-républicaine à l’Antiquité tardive, de nombreuses adaptations et réinterprétations dans la littérature latine, de l’œuvre pionnière d’un Cicéron à la somme théorique léguée au Moyen Âge par un Boèce. De fait, durant cet intervalle de quelque six siècles, les auteurs qui se réclament de Platon adoptent successivement différentes attitudes philosophiques à l’égard du corpus platonicien et recourent à toute une gamme de genres et de formes littéraires pour en exposer les contours. Ils se sont montrés fidèles en cela à la tradition platonicienne qui, dès l’origine, a refusé de se figer dans une orthodoxie dogmatique. Sans prétendre à l’exhaustivité, les différentes contributions réunies dans ce volume cherchent à apporter des éclairages complémentaires sur les différents moments du platonisme latin et sur la variété des approches qui le caractérisent, mettant ainsi en évidence la richesse protéiforme du Plato Latinus.

(Text from the publisher)

Table of contents

C. Lévy & J.-B. Guillaumin, Présentation
T. Reinhardt, Antiochus of Ascalon on Epistemology in the Academic Tradition
F. Renaud, Le projet platonicien d’une rhétorique philosophique et son rapport à la politique chez Cicéron
F. Prost, Le Laelius de Cicéron et le Lysis de Platon
P. Donini, Le fonti medioplatoniche di Seneca : Antioco, la conoscenza e le idee – reprise d’un article de 1977
C. Moreschini, Dio e dèi in Apuleio
A. Setaioli, La citazione di Plotino in Servio, ad. Aen. 9.182
J.-B. Guillaumin, De la représentation mythologique à l’ontologie néoplatonicienne : rôle et statut des dieux chez Martianus Capella
B. Bakhouche, Les Hebraica dans le Commentaire au Timée de Calcidius
A.-I. Bouton-Touboulic, Os illud Platonis : Platonisme, scepticisme et néoplatonisme dans le Contra Academicos d’Augustin
Min-Jun Huh, Les questions sur les universaux dans le premier commentaire de Boèce à l’Isagogè et le débat Plotin-Porphyre autour de l’ousia
Bibliographie générale
Index locorum

Lien

http://www.brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503577890-1

University of Oslo – Department of Classics

Plato and the Ancient Platonic Tradition

Programme

Friday 9th November

13.00 – 13.15: Welcome – Tea/Coffee

13.15 – 14.30: Klaus Corcilius– Universität Tübingen, ‘Practical Reasoning and Participation in the Timaeus

14.30 – 15.45: Pauliina Remes – Uppsala Universitet, ‘From Conversational Virtues to Dialogical Epistemology: Plato and his Commentators’

15.45 – 16.15: Tea/Coffee

16.15 – 17.30: Riccardo Chiaradonna –Università degli studi Roma Tre, ‘‘Existence’ in Neoplatonist Metaphysics’

18.30: Dinner for speakers

Saturday 10th November

9.30 – 10.45: Alexandra Michalewski – Centre Léon Robin, ‘Perception, Recollection and Self-knowledge in Plotinus and other Platonists’

10.45 – 12.00: Jan Opsomer– Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, ‘Argumentative structures and strategies in Proclus’ Elements of Theology

12.00 – 12.45: Lunch

12.45 – 14.00: Jonathan Beere– Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ‘Plato on Why Cities are Ruled’

14.00 – 15.15: Rusty Jones– Harvard University, ‘The Real Challenge of Plato’s Republic

15.15 – 15.45: Tea/Coffee

15.45 – 17.00: Panos Dimas– Universitetet i Oslo, ‘False Pleasures in the Philebus

17.00 – 18.15: David Ebrey – Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ‘The Philosopher’s Courage and the Right Exchange’

20.15: Conference dinner for speakers and local researchers at the restaurant Olympen, Grønlandsleiret 15.

The Conference is funded by the Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas and The Research Council of Norway, and is hosted by the Society for Ancient Philosophy at UiO.

Contact

Time and place: Nov. 9, 2018 – Nov. 10, 2018 2:00 PM, Room 452, Georg Morgenstierne’s House

(Text by the organizers)

Link

https://www.hf.uio.no/ifikk/english/research/news-and-events/events/conferences/2018/plato-and-the-ancient.html

Centre Jean Pépin et LEM

Séminaire d’initiation à la philosophie antique

Le Phèdre de Platon

 

 

Description et organisation

Séminaire d’initiation à la philosophie antique. Centre Jean Pépin et LEM dans le cadre du département de philosophie de l’ENS de la rue d’Ulm – Platonisme et Néoplatonisme organisé par Luc Brisson, Pierre Caye et Philippe Hoffmann. Les séances auront lieu les lundis de 15h à 17h Salle L. 369 Département de Physique École Normale Supérieure 24 rue Lhomond (3éme étage)- 75005 Paris. 

Programme

8 octobre 2018 : Luc Brisson, Titres et structure du Phèdre

15 octobre 2018 : André Rehbinder, De l’epideixis au dithyrambe : étude du rapport entre les deux premiers discours du Phèdre.

12 novembre 2018 : Monique Dixsaut, De quelle dialectique Socrate peut-il être amoureux ?

19 novembre 2018 : Luc Brisson, Le mythe central du Phèdre ; source de la doctrine platonicienne de l’âme.

26 novembre 2018 : Sandra Boehringer, Une eau d’une autre source pour la cruche socratique : l’erôs de Sappho dans le Phèdre.

3 décembre 2018 : Emmanuelle Jouet-Pastré, Le jeu de l’écriture dans le Phèdre.

10 décembre 2018 : Giuseppe Cambiano, La rhétorique comme technique dans le Phèdre.

17 décembre 2018 Alexis Pinchard, La langue des dieux chez Platon : un mythe heuristique ?

14 janvier 2018 : Anne Gabrièle Wersinger, Le discours de Lysias.

21 janvier 2019 : Arnaud Macé, La « Pharmacie de Platon». Derrida interprète du Phèdre.

28 janvier 2019 : Dimitri El Murr, Eros et philia dans le Phèdre.

4 février 2019 : Vivien Longhi, De quelles médecines est-il question dans le Phèdre de Platon ?

11 février 2019 : Philippe Hoffmann, Le Phèdre et les doctrines néoplatoniciennes de l’ascension de l’âme (Plotin, Proclus).

Contact

Département de Physique École Normale Supérieure 24 rue Lhomond (3éme étage)- 75005 Paris. 

(Texte des organisateurs)

Lien

https://umr8230.cnrs.fr/

Universität Bochum

Ancient Modes of Philosophical Inquiry

Description and organization

At least since Socrates, philosophy has been understood as the desire for acquiring a special kind of knowledge, namely wisdom, a kind of knowledge that human beings ordinarily do not possess. According to ancient thinkers this desire may result from a variety of causes: wonder or astonishment, the painful realization that one lacks wisdom, or encountering certain hard perplexities or aporiai. As a result of this basic understanding of philosophy, Greek thinkers tended to regard philosophy as an activity of inquiry (zētēsis) rather than as a specific discipline. Discussions concerning the right manner of engaging in philosophical inquiry – what methodoi or routes of inquiry were best suited to lead one to wisdom – accordingly became an integral part of ancient philosophy, as did the question how such manners of inquiry related to, and differed from, other types of inquiry, for instance medical or mathematical.

It is the ideal of philosophy as inquiry, and the various ways in which ancient philosophers conceived of the manner in which such inquiry should be conducted, that we wish to concentrate on in this issue of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, whose preliminary title is ‘Ancient Modes of Philosophical Inquiry’. Its aim is, broadly, to investigate the various ways in which ancient philosophers conducted their philosophical investigations, and reflected on how philosophical investigation should be conducted. In particular, we understand this topic in contra-distinction to the explicit epistemologies ancient authors have put forward (for instance, the theory Aristotle describes in his Posterior Analytics).

Please also see the extended call that includes topics we are particularly interested in.

According to the current publication plans of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, our issue will appear in print in 2020. Since Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal, we will need to receive submissions by 31 March 2019.

Jens Kristian Larsen (University of Bergen) and Philipp Steinkrüger (Ruhr-Universität Bochum) will serve as Guest-Editors for this volume. For further inquiries, please contact

Contact

Philipp Steinkrüger (philipp.steinkrueger@rub.de)

Jens Kristian Larsen (jens.larsen@uib.no)

(Text by the organisers) 

FIEC

CFP 15TH FIEC ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2019

Description and organization

The 15th annual conference of the International Federation of Associations of Classical Associations / Fédération Internationale des Associations d’Études Classiques (FIEC) will take place in conjunction with the 2019 Classical Association Annual conference on 4th-8th July 2019 in the Institute of Education (UCL) in Bloomsbury London. FIEC business meetings will take place on 4th July, and the conference proper will begin on 5th July. We expect hundreds of classicists from all over the world and at any stage in their career to attend, to hear plenary lectures from international leaders in our field, to present and hear papers, to participate in debates and discussions and to take part in cultural activities and workshops.

The Programme Committee is now inviting proposals for panels and posters.

The Programme Committee aims to select a range of panels that reflects the breadth of traditional and non-traditional classics, including but not limited to Greek and Latin literatures of all periods, linguistics, ancient history in its widest sense, philosophy and religion, art and archaeology, Neo-Latin and Byzantine studies, and the past and current reception of the classics in all media and in different cultures and traditions. We also welcome panels drawing on comparative and interdisciplinary studies. We anticipate there will be panels discussing national traditions in classical research and that some panels will deal with non-Greek peoples such as Etruscans, Persians and Phoenicians. We especially encourage panels dealing with pedagogy and outreach.

Please send all proposals to fiec2019@ucl.ac.uk

Contact

fiec2019@ucl.ac.uk

(Text by the organizers)

Link

https://www.fiec2019.org/

Platonic Pathways

John F Finamore and Danielle A. Layne, Leiden: Brill, 2018

Description

This anthology of 16 essays by scholars from around the world is published in association with the International Society for Neoplatonic Studes: it contains many of the papers presented in their 2016 annual conference.

(Text from the publisher)

Table of contents

The Significance of Initiation Rituals in Plato’s Meno – Michael Romero

Plato’s Timaean Psychology – John Finamore

The Creative Thinker: A New Reading of Numenius fr. 16.10-12 – Joshua Langseth

First Philosophy, Abstract Objects, and Divine Aseity: Aristotle and Plotinus – Robert M. Berchman

Plotinus on philia and its Empedoclean origin – Giannis Stamatellos

In What Sense Does the One Exist? Existence and Hypostasis in Plotinus – Michael Wiitala and Paul DiRado

A Double-Edged Sword: Porphyry on the Perils and Profits of Demonological Inquiry – Seamus O’Neill

Alienation and Divinization: Iamblichus’ Theurgic Vision – Gregory Shaw

Iamblichus’ method for creating Theurgic Sacrifice – Sam Webster

The Understanding of Time and Eternity in the polemic between Eunomius, Basil the Great and Gregory of Nyssa – Tomasz Stępień

Tension in the soul: A Stoic/Platonic concept in Plutarch, Proclus, and Simplicius – Marilynn Lawrence

Peritrope in Damascius as the Apparatus of Speculative Ontology – Tyler Tritten

Mysticism, Apocalypticism, and Platonism – Ilaria Ramelli

Philosophy and Commentary: Evaluating Simplicius on the Presocratics – Bethany Parsons

From Embryo to Saint: a Thomist Account of Being Human – Melissa Rovig Vanden Bout

From the Neoplatonizing Christian Gnosticism of Philip K. Dick to the Neoplatonizing Hermetic Gnosticism of Ralph Waldo Emerson – Jay Bregman

Link

https://brill.com/view/journals/jpt/14/1/article-p87_13.xml?language=en

The Gospel of Thomas and Plato

A Study of the Impact of Platonism on the “Fifth Gospel”

Ivan Miroshnikov, Leiden: Brill, 2018

Description

In The Gospel of Thomas and Plato, Ivan Miroshnikov contributes to the study of the earliest Christian engagements with philosophy by offering the first systematic discussion of the impact of Platonism on the Gospel of Thomas, one of the most intriguing and cryptic works among the Nag Hammadi writings. Miroshnikov demonstrates that a Platonist lens is indispensable to the understanding of a number of the Thomasine sayings that have, for decades, remained elusive as exegetical cruces. The Gospel of Thomas is thus an important witness to the early stages of the process that eventually led to the Platonist formulation of certain Christian dogmata.

(Text from the publisher)

Table of contents

Acknowledgements

A Note to the Reader

Setting the Scene

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on the World

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on the Body and the Soul

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Oneness

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Stability

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Immutability and Indivisibility

The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Freedom from Anger

Thomasine Metaphysics of the Image and Its Platonist Background

Concluding Remarks

The Greek Vorlage of Gos. Thom. 12:2

The Secondary Nature of Gos. Thom. 5:3

A Note on Gos. Thom. 77:1

Bibliography

Index of Ancient and Medieval Sources

Link

https://brill.com/view/title/38096

Ebhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Seelenreisen in antiker philosophischer Literatur

Beschreibung und Organisation

Vor dem Hintergrund eines sich gesellschaftlich wie wissenschaftlich abzeichnenden neuen Interesses an philosophischen und religiösen Diskursen der ‚Seele’ will dieses Projekt eine für antike, vor allem vorsokratische, orphisch-pythagoreische, platonische, jüdische und christliche Seelenkonzeptionen wesentliche konstituierende Komponente – die Unsterblichkeit der menschlichen Seele – konkreter in den Blick nehmen und anhand des heuristischen Paradigmas der Seelenreise sowohl nach historischen Entwicklungen als auch nach systematischen Denkfiguren unter Berücksichtigung der jeweiligen literarischen und Überlieferungs-Kontexte analysieren.

Tagungsprogramm

MONTAG, 30. JULI 2018

ab 13.00 Uhr- Tagungsbüro, Kaffee und Erfrischungen

14.00‒14.15 Uhr Begrüßung

14.15‒15.00 Uhr Prof. Dr. Ioannis Kalogerakos (Athen) Seelenreisen und Raumvorstellungen der Frühzeit

15.00‒15.45 Uhr Prof. Dr. Christoph Riedweg (Zürich) Pythagoreische Jenseitsvorstellungen – eine Spurensuche

15.45‒16.15 Uhr Kaffeepause

16.15‒17.00 Uhr Dr. Alessandro Stavru (Neapel/Mailand) Pythagoreische Seelenreisen bei Aristophanes

17.00‒17.45 Uhr Prof. Dr. Mauro Tulli (Pisa) Homer und Hesiod bei Platon: der Seelenmythos im Phaidon

17.45‒18.30 Uhr Kleiner Empfang

18.30‒20.00 Uhr Abendvortrag Prof. Dr. Jan Bremmer (Groningen) The Journey of Thespesios in the Light of his Predecessors Gemeinsames Abendessen der Referentinnen und Referenten

DIENSTAG, 31. JULI 2018

9.30‒10.15 Uhr Prof. Dr. Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui (Madrid) Hail, Soul, Thou Shalt Be King Hereafter! Political Imagery in the Greek Afterlife Journeys

10.15‒11.00 Uhr Prof. Dr. Gernot M. Müller (Eichstätt) Römische Seelenwanderungen: Ciceros Auffassungen von der Unsterblichkeit der Seele im Horizont seiner Begründung einer Philosophie in Rom

11.00‒11.15 Uhr Kaffeepause

11.15‒12.00 Uhr Prof. Dr. Enno Edzard Popkes (Kiel) Begegnungen von Platonismus und frühem Christentum im Diskursuniversum „Seelenwanderung“: aktuelle Potenziale antiker Denkwelten

12.00‒14.00 Uhr Mittagspause

14.00‒14.45 Uhr Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Jens Halfwassen (Heidelberg) Etwas in uns bleibt immer oben: Plotins Lehre vom nicht-abgestiegenen Seelengrund

14.45‒15.30 Uhr Prof. Dr. Irmgard Männlein-Robert (Tübingen) Reisen der Seele durch Körper, Raum und Text: Porphyrios’ De antro nympharum ab

16.00 Uhr Führung durch das Evangelische Stift Gemeinsames Abendessen der Referentinnen und Referenten

MITTWOCH, 1. AUGUST 2018

9.00‒9.45 Uhr Prof. Dr. Volker Drecoll (Tübingen) Wo bleibt die Seele nach dem Tod? Augustins Aussagen über seelische und körperliche Auferstehung

9.45‒10.30 Uhr Dr. Dmitrij Bumazhnov (Göttingen) Die Reisen des Intellekts und der Baum des Bösen im syrischen Buch des heiligen Hierotheos aus dem 6. Jh. n. Chr.

10.30‒10.45 Uhr Kaffepause 10.45‒11.30 Uhr Prof. Dr. Matthias Perkams (Jena) Seelenreise durch die Himmel. Die Ursache der Gründung von Schulen des Barhadbeschabbas

11.30‒12.15 Uhr Prof. Dr. Jörg Robert (Tübingen) Ekstase und Epistemologie – Athanasius Kirchers Iter exstaticum

12.15‒13.00 Uhr Schlussdiskussion

Kontakt

Prof. Dr. Irmgard Männlein-Robert

irmgard.maennlein-robert@uni-tuebingen.de

(Text der Veranstalter) 

Link

https://fit.uni-tuebingen.de/Project/Details?id=5947

Annaeus Cornutus

Greek Theology, Fragments, and Testimonia

George Boys-Stones, Atlanta: SBL Press, 2018

Description

Cornutus is not well known among students of ancient philosophy. Yet this first-century Stoic philosopher is a very interesting figure and deserves more attention than he has hitherto received. Boys-Stones’ book does much to counteract this disregard. He prints and translates into English Cornutus’ sole extant work, Greek Theology (Ἐπιδρομὴ τῶν κατὰ τὴν ἑλληνικὴν θεολογίαν παραδεδομένων), and collects and translates all fragments and testimonies of Cornutus, adding succinct footnotes. The forty-page introduction enlightens us about Cornutus’ philosophical profile and explains what makes him distinctive. The book is rounded out by an index of sources, concordances, bibliography, and a general index. Why, then, does Cornutus deserve our attention? One reason is his focus on poetry and language from a philosophical point of view. Stoics had a reputation in antiquity for their interest in studying poetry and language from a (distinctive) philosophical standpoint. Indeed they were often criticized for trying to harmonize the stories of early poets, such as Homer and Hesiod, with Stoic doctrine (Cicero, De nat. deor. I.41, Philodemus, De pietate col. vi, Plutarch, De aud. poet. 31d). Cornutus exemplifies an intriguing variation of this Stoic tendency. Like other Stoics, Cornutus had a deep interest in poetry, as is suggested by his composition of commentaries on Virgil (pp. 182–94), and it is no accident that his students in Rome included the poets Lucan and Persius (see Life of Persius and Persius, Satura 5, Boys-Stones pp. 198–215). Cornutus was in fact renowned as a critic of poetry in late antiquity (Augustine, De Utilitate Credendi 17; F37 Boys-Stones). The evidence suggests that Cornutus’ focus on poetry was part of his broader interest in language. This becomes evident in his treatise on orthography, of which we only have the Latin excerpts of Cassiodorus (collected and translated by Boys-Stones pp. 142-155). Cornutus’ interest in language also motivated his engagement with Aristotle’s Categories—yet another reason for which Cornutus deserves our attention. For, while contemporary Platonists such as Lucius and Nicostratus conceived the Categories as an ontological work, that is, as a work that distinguishes kinds of beings, and contemporary Peripatetics understood it as a work of semantics, that is, a work concerned with words that have meaning, Cornutus instead considered the Categories to be a work of grammar dealing with words as such (περὶ τῶν λέξεων καθὸ λέξεις, Porphyry In Cat. 59.10 Busse), and accused Aristotle of leaving out certain classes of words. This interpretation of the Categories is peculiar to Stoicism. Cornutus was preceded by Athenodorus in criticizing the Categories as a deficient treatment of verbal expressions, in the same way that contemporary Platonists considered it as a deficient work of ontology, but Cornutus went further than Athenodorus in also challenging the coherence of Aristotle’s work. Cornutus’ interpretation has recently been well presented by Griffin, yet now Boys-Stones has collected and translated the relevant evidence (pp. 167–76).

(Table of contents)

Table of contents

Abbreviations

Acknowledgements

Introduction: Cornutus the Philosopher

  1. Preface
  2. The life of Cornutus
  3. Stoicism in the first century AD

3.1. Stoicism as an international movement

3.2. Stoicism as a ‘textual community’

3.3. Stoicism: the intellectual programme

  1. Cornutus’ Philosophical Views

4.1. ‘Dialectic’4.1.1. Logic: Cornutus on Aristotle’s Categories

4.1.2. Rhetoric: the social context for wisdom traditions

4.2 Physics

4.3 Ethics

  1. Conclusion

Titles of works by Cornutus

Notes on Texts and Referencing

The Greek Theology [Survey of the Greek Theological Tradition]

Preface

  1. Structure

1.1. Introduction

1.2. Structural markers in the Greek Theology

1.3. The Greek Theology  and Plato’s Timaeus

  1. Cornutus and the tradition of allegorical reading

Text and translation

On Pronunciation or Orthography (surviving extracts)

Preface

Text and translation

Fragments and Testimonia

Life

Greek theology

Aristotle’s Categories

Physics and metaphysics

Rhetoric

Fame as a critic

Virgil

Lucan

Miscellaneous

Cornutus and Persius

The ancient Life of Persius

Persius, Satire 5

Index of Sources

Concordance

References

Link

https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2021/2021.04.37/

University College Dublin

The Relationship between Aristotle’s Eudemian

and Nicomachean Ethics

 

Programme 

15 June

9:00-9:30 Coffee/Tea

9:30-10:45 – Carlo Natali (Venice) – The Proems to the EE and the EN

Chair: Tim Crowley (Dublin)

10:45-12:00 – Karen Margrethe Nielsen (Oxford) – Prohairesis in the EE and the EN

Chair: Luciana Soares Santoprete (CNRS/Dublin)                                  

12:00-12:15 Coffee/Tea

12:15-13:30 – Giulio Di Basilio (Dublin) – Habituation in the EE and the EN

Chair: Rowland Stout (Dublin)

13:30-15:00 Lunch

15:00-16:15 – Giulia Bonasio (New York City) – Perfect Agency in the EE and the EN

Chair: Bjorn Wastvedt (Arizona)

16:15-16:30 Coffee/Tea

16:30-17:45 – Terence Irwin (Oxford) – Voluntariness in the EE and the EN

Chair: Vasilis Politis (Dublin)

17:45-18:30 Round Table/Discussion

19:00 Conference Dinner

16 June

9:00-9:30 Coffee/Tea

9:30-10:45 – Marco Zingano (São Paulo) – The Definition of Virtue in the EE and the EN

Chair: Helen Dixon (Dublin)

10:45-12:00 – Friedemann Buddensiek (Frankfurt) – The Ergon Arguments in the EE and the EN

Chair: Peter Larsen (Dublin)

12:00-13:00 Lunch

13:00-14:15 – Christopher Rowe (Durham) – The EE and the EN: A Study in the Development of Aristotle’s Thought (1971) Revisited

                            Chair: John Dillon (Dublin)

14:15-15:30 – Round Table/Closing Remarks

Contact:

Dublin, NUI Headquarters (49 Merrion Square)

maria.baghramian@ucd.ie

(Text by the organizers)

Link

http://www.ucd.ie/philosophy/