KU Leuven
Polemics, Rivalry and Networking in Greco-Roman Antiquity
Description and organization
Disagreement and scholarly dispute are essential to any intellectual development. This holds true for ancient cultures no less than for us today. Greek philosophy has been agonistic from long before the formal constitution of philosophical ‘schools’ in the Hellenistic age. In the classical period, Athens famously served as an intellectual battlefield between Socrates and the sophists, in which a full armory of eristic and elenctic strategies was developed. This confrontation was to become a paradigm for the opposition between rhetorical and philosophical models of education, from Plato and Isocrates to the Second Sophistic and beyond.
The Hellenistic age saw the rise of schools and other, often more informal types of network which committed its members to a core set of doctrines – not only in philosophy (Stoicism, Epicureanism, Skepticism), but also in medicine (dogmatists vs. empiricists), science (mathematical astronomy vs. more philosophical cosmologies), historiography (pragmatic vs. rhetorical and tragic approaches; pro-Roman vs. pro-Carthaginian accounts), grammar (allegoricists vs. literalists), rhetoric (asianism vs. atticism), poetry (epos vs. shorter types of poetry), and theology (traditionalist vs. more liberal approaches). An essential ingredient of this phenomenon is the development of stereotypic depictions of rival schools and fixed patterns of refutations. Many of these depictions and tropes survived the actual debates from which they emerged and the schools against which they were directed, as is apparent from the Platonic and Christian texts from late Antiquity.
In the Hellenistic period, we also witness the emergence of new intellectual centers, like Alexandria, and of increasingly text-based scholarly communities and networks. From the early imperial age onwards, authoritative texts became increasingly important vehicles of wisdom, and written commentaries gradually acquired a central place in philosophical, rhetorical and religious education. Both Christians and pagans adopted polemical strategies in distinguishing between orthodox and heterodox interpretations of their founding texts, thus leading to controversy between authors who often had much more in common than they were ready to admit. In this context, polemical strategies not only served to refute one’s opponents, but also contributed to establishing intra-school identity and intellectual alliances.
The aim of this conference is to study the role that polemical strategies and intellectual controversy have played in the establishment of ancient learned networks, such as philosophical and scientific schools, scholarly and religious communities, literary circles, etc., as well as in the dynamics of intellectual alliances, traditions, and ‘personal’ networks.
Confirmed keynote speakers:
- Philip van der Eijk (Berlin)
- Peter Gemeinhardt (Göttingen)
- Pantelis Golitsis (Thessaloniki)
- Irmgard Männlein-Robert (Tübingen)
- John Marincola (Florida State University)
Please submit your proposal via email (lectio@kuleuven.be) by February 28, 2018.
Visit our website (http://lectio.ghum.kuleuven.be/lectio/conferences).
Programme
Wednesday 12 December 2018 | Conference day 1 | Institute of Philosophy
14.30 – 15.30 Registration
15.30 – 15.45 Opening of the Conference Wim DECOCK | Director of Lectio
15.45 – 16.15 Session 1
Chair – Jan Opsomer Marco DONATO (Pisa & Paris), Polemics in the Pseudoplatonica: The Academy’s Agenda and the Renaissance of Socratic Dialogue
16.15 – 16.45 Wim NIJS (Leuven), Graeculus et adsentator: Philodemus’ Defence of Epicurean Friendship and Frank Speech in Roman Society
16.45 – 17.15 | Chiara MILITELLO (Catania), Replying to Stoics as the Basis of True Aristotelianism: the Significance of Polemics in Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Commentaries and Treatises
17.15 – 18.00 Coffee
18.00 – 19.00 Keynote Lecture 1 | Chair – Gerd Van Riel Irmgard MÄNNLEIN-ROBERT (Tübingen), Subtile Battles or Platonic Exegesis as Polemical Strategy in Porphyry
19.00 Reception | Raadzaal Institute of Philosophy | Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, Leuven
Thursday 13 December 2018 | Conference day 2 | Holland College
Session 2 | Chair – Danny Praet
09.00 – 09.30 András HANDL (Leuven), The Influence of Real-Life Encounters on the Treatment of Heterodox Groups in the Refutatio Omnium Haeresium
09.30 – 10.00 Benjamin DE VOS (Gent), The Homilistic Disputes Between Clement and Appion: the Art of Dissimulation and Irony in a Clash Between Judeo-Christianity and Paganism for the ‘True’ Paideia
10.00 – 10.30 Marina DÍAZ BOURGEAL (Madrid), “Oὐ λέξεων μόνον, ἠθῶν δέ”: Julian on the Christian Teachers and Hellenism
10.30 – 11.00 Coffee
11.00 – 12.00 Keynote Lecture 2 | Chair – Johan Leemans
Peter GEMEINHARDT (Göttingen), “Against the Avarice of the Melitians and the Impiety of the Ariomanites!” Polemics and Networking in the 4th-Century Trinitarian Debates
12.00 – 13.30 Lunch
Middaggesprek | Chair – Bart Pattyn Danny PRAET (Gent) & Jos VERHEYDEN (Leuven), Vurige tongen of te vuur en te zwaard? Het succes van het christendom in het Romeinse Rijk: spontaan of onder dwang
Session 3 | Chair – Bram Demulder
13.30 – 14.00 Bruno MARIEN (Leuven), The Recommendation Activity in Late Antique Epistolographers seen against the Background of Competing Personal Networks: the Example of Libanius and Other Fourth-century Letter Writers
14.00 – 14.30 Other Fourth-century Letter Writers Olivier DEMERRE (Gent), Philostratus’ Life of Hermogenes: Rhetorical Debates and Circles in the Lives of the Sophists
14.30 – 15.00 Han BALTUSSEN (Adelaide), Polemic, Personality and the Iamblichan Lineage in Eunapius’ VPS
15.00 – 15.30 Coffee
Session 4 | Chair – Stefan Schorn
15.30 – 16.00 Eva FALASCHI (Pisa), It is not just a Question of Being the Best. Artistic Rivalry and Polemics Among Greek Artists as Seen in the Imperial Age
16.00 – 16.30 Tiberiu POPA (Indianapolis), Can Historians Handle the Truth?
16.30 – 17.00 Carlos STEEL (Leuven), A Newly Discovered Treatise from the School of Alexandria. A Discussion on the Status of Astrology at the End of the 6th Century
19.30 Conference Dinner | Faculty Club | Groot Begijnhof 14, Leuven
Friday 14 December 2018 | Conference day 3 | Holland College
Session 5 | Chair – Marc-Antoine Gavray
09.00 – 09.30 Irini FOTINI-VILTANIOTI (Leuven), Denouncing the Old Rivalry Between Philology and Philosophy: Porphyry’s Homerica
09.30 – 10.00 Corentin TRESNIE (Brussels & Leuven), Se construire un maître à penser: les Vies de Plotin et Pythagore par Porphyre et Jamblique
10.00 – 11.00 Keynote Lecture 4 | Chair – Pieter d’Hoine Pantelis GOLITSIS (Thessaloniki), Explicit and Implicit Polemics in Late Ancient Commentaries on Aristotle
11.00 – 11.30 Coffee
Session 6 | Chair – Michiel Meeusen
11.30 – 12.00 Thorsten FÖGEN (Durham), Rival or Ally? Competition, Controversy and Polemics in Ancient Technical Discourse
12.00 – 12.30 Argyro LITHARI (Berlin), Platonic Teachings and Astronomers’ Hypotheses in Proclus’ Hypotyposis Astronomicarum Positionum: Between Opposition and Agreement
12.30 – 13.30 Lunch
Keynote Lecture 5 | Chair – Geert Roskam
13.30 – 14.30 Philip VAN DER EIJK (Berlin), Polemics and Rivalry in the Ancient Medical Tradition
14.30 – 15.00 Coffee
Session 7 | Chair – Marijke Crab
15.00 – 15.30 Ute TISCHER (Leipzig), Comparison and Competition: ‘Cicero’, ‘Virgil’, and the Authority of the Interpreter
15.30 – 16.00 Josh SMITH (Baltimore), (Mis)reading the Poet: A Networking Strategy in Ancient Criticism
16.00 Plenary discussion & Conclusion
Contact
Erika.gielen@kuleuven.be
lectio@kuleuven.be.
(Text by the organizers)
Link
http://lectio.ghum.kuleuven.be/lectio/themes/lectio/images/CFP_Polemics.pdf